How underground ā€˜hot rocksā€™ could power Americaā€™s future

51²č¹Ż Geology Professor David Blackwell, an internationally recognized authority on geothermal energy, talks about how hot rocks miles below the earthā€™s surface be the ā€œkiller appā€ of the energy industry.

By Gregory M. Lamb
Staff Writer for The Christian Science Monitor

Could hot rocks miles below the earthā€™s surface be the ā€œkiller appā€ of the energy industry?

Google thinks so. Itā€™s investing more than $10 million to develop new technology that would make this subterranean resource a widespread, economically viable competitor to fossil fuels.

Geothermal heat could meet 10 percent of Americaā€™s energy needs by mid-century, according to the US Department of Energy. Whatā€™s more, it would not generate the climate-warming carbon emissions associated with fossil fuels.

Once tapped, a geothermal system would stay online for centuries. Unlike wind and solar, it would be a ā€œbase loadā€ energy source, available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

That all sounds great ā€“ but of course thereā€™s a catch. A geothermal well costs millions of dollars to drill and drilling is the only way to determine if a location has the right kind of hot rock. The result: With only a trickle of federal aid allotted to developing the resource, geothermal is growing slowly.

That may change under the Obama administration, which has pledged strong support for renewable energy. . .

ā€œI think itā€™s going to really require the federal government to stimulate activity by coming in and trying to support demonstration projects and things like that for it to get started in a big way,ā€ says David Blackwell, a professor of geophysics at 51²č¹Ż, one of the 18 members of MITā€™s EGS study panel. ā€œThere are some places in the central and eastern United States that are quite hot at reasonable depths that could probably be developed in the relatively near future.ā€

.

# # #